LinkedIn Learning Review 2026

Official site: linkedin.com/learning

★★★★½ 4.6 / 5 Try LinkedIn Learning

Pros

  • Certificates appear directly on your LinkedIn profile
  • 21,000+ courses across business, tech, and creative
  • Personalised learning recommendations
  • Often included with LinkedIn Premium

Cons

  • Monthly cost is higher than some alternatives
  • Courses are shorter and less in-depth than Coursera
  • No academic accreditation

Overview

LinkedIn Learning, owned by Microsoft, integrates smoothly with the LinkedIn professional network. Its key differentiator is that completed courses automatically populate your LinkedIn profile, giving your credentials immediate visibility to recruiters and hiring managers. With over 21,000 courses, it covers business, technology, creative skills, and leadership.

Content and Quality

Courses are produced to a professional standard with experienced industry instructors. The content tends toward shorter, practical modules (typically 1-4 hours) rather than the extended programs found on Coursera. This suits professionals who want targeted skill updates rather than complete credentials.

Pricing

LinkedIn Learning costs AUD 49.99 per month, or is included with LinkedIn Premium Career (AUD 64.99/month) and LinkedIn Premium Business. A one-month free trial is available. For Australian professionals already considering LinkedIn Premium, the bundled access represents strong value.

Scoring Breakdown

Content Quality8.8 / 10
Certificate Value8.2 / 10
Platform Usability9.0 / 10
Value for Money7.8 / 10
Try LinkedIn Learning

Tested using a personally funded subscription. No payment received from LinkedIn. Affiliate commissions may apply.

Alternatives

Coursera logo

Coursera

For university-backed certificates with more depth and formal recognition.

See Review
Udemy logo

Udemy

For a vast library of affordable one-off course purchases with lifetime access.

See Review
Skillshare logo

Skillshare

Strong creative and design focus with a lower monthly subscription fee.

See Review

Editorial comparison only. We may earn affiliate commissions on outgoing links.

We use cookies to improve your experience. Learn more